Life Cycle Environmental Impact of Biomass Co-Firing with Coal at a Power Plant in the Greater Houston Area

Raghava Rao Kommalapati, Iqbal Hossan, Venkata Sai Vamsi Botlaguduru, Hongbo Du and Ziaul Huque
Additional contact information
Raghava Rao Kommalapati: Center for Energy & Environmental Sustainability, and Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Prairie View A & M University, Prairie View, TX 77446, USA
Iqbal Hossan: Center for Energy & Environmental Sustainability, Prairie View A & M University, Prairie View, TX 77446, USA
Venkata Sai Vamsi Botlaguduru: Center for Energy & Environmental Sustainability, Prairie View A & M University, Prairie View, TX 77446, USA
Hongbo Du: Center for Energy & Environmental Sustainability, Prairie View A & M University, Prairie View, TX 77446, USA
Ziaul Huque: Center for Energy & Environmental Sustainability, and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Prairie View A & M University, Prairie View, TX 77446, USA

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 7, 1-18

Abstract: Electricity generation from coal is one of the leading contributors to greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. and has adverse effects on the environment. Biomass from forest residue can be co-fired with coal to reduce the impact of fossil-fuel power plants on the environment. W. A. Parish power plant (WAP, Richmond, TX, USA) located in the greater Houston area is the largest coal and natural gas-based power generation facility in Texas and is the subject of the current study. A life cycle assessment (LCA) study was performed with SimaPro ® and IMPACT 2002+ method, for the replacement of 5%, 10%, and 15% coal (energy-basis) with forest residue at the WAP power plant in Texas. Results from the LCA study indicate that life cycle air emissions of CO 2 , CO, SO 2 , PM 2.5 , NO X , and VOC could reduce by 13.5%, 6.4%, 9.5%, 9.2%, 11.6%, and 7.7% respectively when 15% of coal is replaced with forest residue. Potential life cycle impact decreased across 9 mid-point impact categories of, human/aquatic toxicity, respiratory organics/inorganics, global warming, non-renewable energy, mineral extraction, aquatic acidification, and terrestrial acidification/nitrification. The potential impact across damage/end-point categories of human health, ecosystem quality, climate change, and resources reduced by 8.7%, 3.8%, 13.2%, and 14.8% respectively for 15% co-firing ratio.

Keywords: W. A. Parish power plant; life cycle assessment; mid-point impacts; end-point impacts; biomass co-firing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2193/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2193/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2193-:d:154719

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().