Does Firm Performance Influence Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting of Chinese Listed Companies?
Muhammad Safdar Sial,
Chunmei Zheng,
Nguyen Vinh Khuong,
Tehmina Khan and
Muhammad Usman
Additional contact information
Muhammad Safdar Sial: School of Economics and Management of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
Chunmei Zheng: School of Economics and Management of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
Nguyen Vinh Khuong: Faculty of Accounting and Auditing, University of Economics and Law, Viet Nam National University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
Tehmina Khan: School of Accounting, RMIT University, Melbourne 3000, Australia
Muhammad Usman: School of Management, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 7, 1-12
Abstract:
This study aims to investigate whether firm performance influences corporate social responsibility reporting of Chinese listed companies. We have used the sample of all A-share listed firms on Shenzhen and Shanghai stock exchanges for the period 2008 to 2015. The authors used pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) regression as a baseline methodology. To control the possible problem of endogeneity we use one year lagged and two-stage least squares regression. We find that firm performance has a statistically significant impact on CSR reporting. Moreover, we see that firms with high performance are more likely to report CSR activities than low-performance firms. Additionally, five of the control variables (board size, CEO power, SOE, firm size, and Big4) have some influence on CSR reporting. These findings hold for a set of robustness tests. Our results have implications for the development of CSR reporting in developing countries like China. Our research suggests that, in China, companies with better financial performance undertake more CSR reporting. The paper contributes to the existing literature by investigating the effect of firm performance on CSR reporting of Chinese listed companies. Additionally, this paper enriches the current literature on CSR reporting and highlights the importance of a firm’s financial performance for better environmental performance and reporting.
Keywords: corporate social responsibility; firm performance; stakeholder theory; slack resources theory; legitimacy theory; China (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (27)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2217/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2217/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2217-:d:155014
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().