Low-Input Herbicide Management: Effects on Rapeseed Production and Profitability
Paola A. Deligios,
Gianluca Carboni,
Roberta Farci,
Stefania Solinas and
Luigi Ledda
Additional contact information
Paola A. Deligios: Department of Agriculture, Division of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39, 07100 Sassari, Italy
Gianluca Carboni: Agris Sardegna—Agricultural Research Agency of Sardinia, Viale Trieste 111, 09123 Cagliari, Italy
Roberta Farci: Department of Agriculture, Division of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39, 07100 Sassari, Italy
Stefania Solinas: Department of Agriculture, Division of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39, 07100 Sassari, Italy
Luigi Ledda: Department of Agriculture, Division of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39, 07100 Sassari, Italy
Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 7, 1-16
Abstract:
The oilseed rape conventional system can be moved to a more sustainable one by reducing herbicide application whilst ensuring at the same time effective weed control, maintaining oilseed rape yield, and quality and increasing profitability. Over three growing season periods, two field experiments at two different Southern Italy locations were carried out. In both sites, a conventional weed-control management system (recommended label dose), four alternative low-herbicide treatments, and an untreated control were compared. We monitored weeds and crop response to herbicide treatments, and calculated the net economic return, within site and year, for each treatment. In experiment 1, a half dose of herbicide did not show any significant difference in seed yield with respect to conventional treatment in two of three growing seasons. In experiment 2, compared with the conventional system, weedy control and the lowest applied herbicide dose treatment (25% of the recommended label dose) did not underline significant differences with regard to yield level. Net returns from the half dose of metazachlor herbicide were not significantly lower than net returns from conventional treatment in experiment 1 (on a three-year average 748 vs. 812 € ha −1 , respectively). Our findings suggest that the herbicide dose might be cut by at least 50% in order not to jeopardize negative effects on production and economic performances.
Keywords: Brassica napus var. oleifera; yield components; sustainable crop management; weed management; profitability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2258/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2258/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2258-:d:155403
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().