How to Avoid Pigeonholing the Environmental Manager?

Julien Boucher, Clotilde Jenny, Zara Plummer and Gerhard Schneider
Additional contact information
Julien Boucher: University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland//HES-SO, HEIG-VD, Av. des Sports 20, CH-1401 Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland
Clotilde Jenny: University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland//HES-SO, HEIG-VD, Av. des Sports 20, CH-1401 Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland
Zara Plummer: EA ECCO, Chemin de Vignes d’Argent 7, CH-1004 Lausanne, Switzerland
Gerhard Schneider: University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland//HES-SO, HEIG-VD, Av. des Sports 20, CH-1401 Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 7, 1-18

Abstract: The research investigates the role the environmental manager plays to ensure a successful (or not) implementation of environmental performance within an organization. It is based on interviews of 5–7 actors per company within a sample of 7 companies (42 interviews). We build upon bias of perception of the various actors interviewed within each company to define 4 paradoxes related to the roles and mission of the environmental manager that hinder proper efficiency of environmental management at company level. Paradox 1 is that no one takes ownership of environmental performance within the organization. Paradox 2 is that the environmental manager is in an awkward situation vis-à-vis his boss. Paradox 3 is that the role of the environmental manager in relation to employees is ambiguous. Paradox 4 is that corporate and product approaches are decoupled. We suggest that these paradoxes interact and form a vicious cycle that may, in part, be responsible for the environmental decoupling phenomenon—companies often adopt a sustainability policy symbolically without implementing it substantively. Our research suggests that, by leveraging the leadership of the environmental manager through organizational and motivational measures, the vicious cycle can be transformed into a virtuous cycle and the human motivation can become a driver for green change within corporations. We proposed the SEA (Shaping Environmental Action) model based of 4 pillars: information, motivation, organization, and strategy.

Keywords: ecodesign; environmental decoupling; environmental management; maturity model; paradox theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2538/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2538/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2538-:d:158888

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().