Visual Analysis of the Height Ratio between Building and Background Vegetation. Two Rural Cases of Study: Spain and Sweden

Jacinto Garrido-Velarde, María Jesús Montero-Parejo, Julio Hernández-Blanco and Lorenzo García-Moruno
Additional contact information
Jacinto Garrido-Velarde: Department of Human Science, University of La Rioja, Logroño 26006, Spain
María Jesús Montero-Parejo: Department of Graphics Design, University of Extremadura, Plasencia 10600, Spain
Julio Hernández-Blanco: Department of Graphics Design, University of Extremadura, Plasencia 10600, Spain
Lorenzo García-Moruno: Department of Graphics Design, University of Extremadura, Plasencia 10600, Spain

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 8, 1-17

Abstract: The perception of apparent sizes of buildings in a rural environment depends on the height ratio between the building and its surrounding vegetation, and it is this parameter which is currently used to assess the built landscapes. The impact of a contrasting height is less strong if the building does not exceed the horizon line. For buildings overshooting the skyline, the building’s level of sharpness and number of lines in contrast to the sky determines the impact of the scales, and vegetation in the background helps to reduce impact. The specific objectives of the present study were: (1) finding height–ratio thresholds between building and background vegetation, which may improve the integration of rural buildings in sky-sensitive locations, and; (2) comparing the results in two rural contexts with very different climatic conditions: Spain and Sweden. A survey of eighteen scenarios (nine Spanish and nine Swedish), all digitally modified with different relative height ratios between vegetation and buildings, was performed. The survey was evaluated by the public from both countries. Regardless of the country of origin, integration of the building was good or very good when the vegetation in background did not exceed one half of the height of the construction. These results may be translated to technical criteria for planning assessment.

Keywords: landscape; buildings; vegetation screens; visual impact (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2593/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2593/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2593-:d:159646

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().