Assessing the Capacity to Govern Flood Risk in Cities and the Role of Contextual Factors

Steven Koop, Fabian Monteiro Gomes, Laura Schoot, Carel Dieperink, Peter Driessen and Kees Van Leeuwen
Additional contact information
Steven Koop: Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, Utrecht 3584 CS, The Netherlands
Fabian Monteiro Gomes: Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, Utrecht 3584 CS, The Netherlands
Laura Schoot: Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, Utrecht 3584 CS, The Netherlands
Carel Dieperink: Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, Utrecht 3584 CS, The Netherlands
Peter Driessen: Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, Utrecht 3584 CS, The Netherlands
Kees Van Leeuwen: Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, Utrecht 3584 CS, The Netherlands

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 8, 1-21

Abstract: Sea level rise and increased storm events urge cities to develop governance capacity. However, a cohesive conceptual and empirical-based understanding of what governance capacity implies, how to measure it, and what cities can learn, is largely lacking. Understanding the influence of context is critical to address this issue. Accordingly, we aim to identify crosscutting contextual factors and how they prioritise different elements of governance capacity to address urban flood risk. In doing so, a framework of nine conditions and 27 indicators is applied in two Dutch cities and two cities in the United Kingdom. Three crosscutting contextual factors are identified that may explain differences in capacity-development priorities: (1) flood probability and impact; (2) national imposed institutional setting; and, (3) level of authority to secure long-term financial support. Capacity-priorities include, the recent political devolution in the UK, which emphasizes the role of citizen awareness, stakeholder engagement, entrepreneurial agents, and the overall necessity for local capacity-development. The Dutch focus on flood safety through centralised public coordination reduces flood probability but inhibits incentives to reduce flood impacts and lowers public awareness. In conclusion, the three identified contextual factors enable a better understanding of capacity-building priorities and may facilitate learning between cities.

Keywords: water governance; governance capacity; comparative studies; urban flooding; contextual factors (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2869/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2869/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2869-:d:163451

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().