Green Payment and Perceived Rural Landscape Quality: A Cost-Benefit Analysis in Central Italy

Raffaele Cortignani, Federica Gobattoni, Raffaele Pelorosso and Maria Nicolina Ripa
Additional contact information
Federica Gobattoni: DAFNE, Università degli Studi della Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
Raffaele Pelorosso: DAFNE, Università degli Studi della Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
Maria Nicolina Ripa: DAFNE, Università degli Studi della Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 8, 1-15

Abstract: The conservation of perceived scenery of traditional extensive and diversified landscapes is a valuable aim for reaching sustainable rural development. Considering the financial budget assigned and the application rules of European Union agricultural policy (Common Agricultural Policy—CAP), the relationship between perceived landscape benefits and CAP first pillar payments is an interesting aspect to analyze. In this study, a cost-benefit analysis has been carried out in a rural area of Central Italy that represents typical Italian conditions of hilly territories. Greening payment, a mechanism aimed to boost public goods, including landscapes and their ecological functionality, was selected as a proxy for policy cost of preserving traditional extensive landscapes. The benefits of greening have been evaluated through the analysis of the people’s willingness to pay for the maintenance of extensive and diversified landscapes. The analysis conducted does not explicitly consider the full range of environmental benefits determined by greening, even if some interviewees may have perceived them in addition to the visual perception of the rural landscape. The present study can contribute to the debate on the agricultural policy post-2020, especially for a future definition of long-lasting and cost-effective sustainable interventions in hilly and extensive rural landscapes.

Keywords: greening payments; contingent valuation; cost/benefit analysis; sustainable rural development; CAP; landscape perception (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2910/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2910/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2910-:d:164122

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().