Industrial or Traditional Bamboo Construction? Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Bamboo-Based Buildings

Edwin Zea Escamilla, Guillaume Habert, Juan Francisco Correal Daza, Hector F. Archilla, Juan Sebastian Echeverry Fernández and David Trujillo
Additional contact information
Edwin Zea Escamilla: Centre for Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability, University of Zürich, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Guillaume Habert: Institute of Construction Management, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Juan Francisco Correal Daza: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, 111711 Bogotá, Colombia
Hector F. Archilla: Amphibia–BASE & Visiting Research Fellow, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
Juan Sebastian Echeverry Fernández: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, 111711 Bogotá, Colombia
David Trujillo: School of Energy, Construction and Environment, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 9, 1-14

Abstract: The past five decades have witnessed an unprecedented growth in population. This has led to an ever-growing housing demand. It has been proposed that the use of bio-based materials, and specifically bamboo, can help alleviate the housing demand in a sustainable manner. The present paper aims to assess the environmental impact caused by using four different construction materials (bamboo, brick, concrete hollow block, and engineered bamboo) in buildings. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) was carried out to measure the environmental impact of the different construction materials in the construction of single and multi-storey buildings. The LCA considered the extraction, production, transport, and use of the construction materials. The IPCC2013 evaluation method from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC2013 was used for the calculations of CO 2 emissions. The assessment was geographically located in Colombia, South America, and estimates the transport distances of the construction materials. The results show that transportation and reinforcing materials significantly contribute to the environmental impact, whereas the engineered bamboo construction system has the lowest environmental impact. The adoption of bamboo-based construction systems has a significant potential to support the regenerative development of regions where they could be used and might lead to long-lasting improvements to economies, environments, and livelihoods.

Keywords: bamboo; glue-laminated bamboo; life cycle assessment; CO 2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3096/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3096/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:3096-:d:166731

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().