Environmental Restoration in Hydropower Development—Lessons from Norway

Inger Auestad, Yngve Nilsen and Knut Rydgren
Additional contact information
Inger Auestad: Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 5020 Bergen, Norway
Yngve Nilsen: Department of Social Science, Faculty of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 5020 Bergen, Norway
Knut Rydgren: Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 5020 Bergen, Norway

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 9, 1-12

Abstract: Hydropower is expanding globally and is regarded a key measure for mitigating climate change, but it also results in major environmental degradation, both at local scale and more widely. We can learn lessons about how restoration can be used to alleviate these problems from failures and successes in countries with a long history of hydropower development, such as Norway. Here, hydropower projects grew larger over time, and in the 1960s, the emerging environmentalist movement started to challenge hydropower developments because of their negative impacts on the environment. The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate then appointed a landscape architect who became very influential, particularly due to his skills in aesthetics and photo documentation. He developed principles for designing self-sustaining environments which he called “living nature”, and in particular proposed methods of restoring barren, unattractive, alpine spoil heaps. Later, restoration methods and goals have changed in response to new insights and the changing goals of ecological restoration. Here, we present current best practice for the alpine biome and sum up general lessons in three points: restoration can represent a sustainable, ‘third way’ in the conflict between conservation and development; including a wider group of professionals may improve restoration goals and methods, and effective use of visual communication can be a good way of gaining support for new restoration principles.

Keywords: renewable energy; restoration ecology; environmental degradation; Norway; landscape architecture; hydropower; management; planning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3358/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3358/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:3358-:d:170948

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().