EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Variation of the Soil Bacterial and Fungal Community Is Linked to Land Use Types in Northeast China

Jincai Ma, Sumiya Nergui, Ziming Han, Guannan Huang, Huiru Li, Rui Zhang, Liyue Zhu and Jiafen Liao
Additional contact information
Jincai Ma: Key Laboratory of Ground Water Resource and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
Sumiya Nergui: College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
Ziming Han: State Key Laboratory of Environmental Aquatic Chemistry, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
Guannan Huang: College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
Huiru Li: College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
Rui Zhang: College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
Liyue Zhu: College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
Jiafen Liao: College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 12, 1-15

Abstract: From the west to the east across Northeast China, there are three major land use types, ranging from agricultural-pastoral interlaced land, crop land, and forest land. The soil microbial community of each land use type has been reported; however, a thorough comparison of the soil microbial ecology of soils from each land use type has not been made. In the current study, soil samples from agricultural-pastoral land, crop land, and an artificial economic forest were collected from Tongliao, Siping, and Yanji, respectively. The structure and composition of bacterial and fungal communities was investigated by a next generation sequencing protocol, and soil physicochemical properties were also determined. Pair-wise analysis showed some soil parameters were significantly different between agricultural-pastoral land and crop land or forest land, while those soil parameters shared more similarities in crop land and forest land soils. Principal coordinates analysis and dissimilarity analyses jointly indicated that bacterial and fungal communities from each sampling site were quite different. Canonical correspondence analysis and a partial Mantel test showed that the community structures of bacteria and fungi were mainly affected by clay, pH, water soluble organic carbon (WSOC), and total soluble nitrogen (TN). Co-occurrence network analysis and the associated topological features revealed that the network of the bacterial community was more complex than that of the fungal community. Clay, pH, WSOC, and NH 4 + -N were major drivers and pH and WSOC were major factors in shaping the network of the bacterial community and the fungal community, respectively. In brief, our results indicated that microbial diversity, co-occurrence network patterns, and their shaping factors differed greatly among soils of distinct land use types in Northeast China. Our data also provided insights into the sustainable use of soils under different land use types.

Keywords: bacterial community; fungal community; land use type; soil (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3286/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3286/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:12:p:3286-:d:239840

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:12:p:3286-:d:239840