EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Enhancing Health Through Access to Nature: How Effective are Interventions in Woodlands in Deprived Urban Communities? A Quasi-experimental Study in Scotland, UK

Catharine Ward Thompson, Aldo Elizalde, Steven Cummins, Alastair H. Leyland, Willings Botha, Andrew Briggs, Sara Tilley, Eva Silveirinha de Oliveira, Jenny Roe, Peter Aspinall and Richard Mitchell
Additional contact information
Catharine Ward Thompson: OPENspace, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 9DF, UK
Aldo Elizalde: Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
Steven Cummins: Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK
Alastair H. Leyland: Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office (MRC/CSO) Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G2 3AX, UK
Willings Botha: RTI Health Solutions, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, USA
Andrew Briggs: Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RZ, UK
Sara Tilley: OPENspace, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 9DF, UK
Eva Silveirinha de Oliveira: OPENspace, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 9DF, UK
Jenny Roe: Center for Design and Health, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
Peter Aspinall: OPENspace, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 9DF, UK
Richard Mitchell: Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office (MRC/CSO) Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G2 3AX, UK

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 12, 1-21

Abstract: High prevalence of poor mental health is a major public health problem. Natural environments may contribute to mitigating stress and enhancing health. However, there is little evidence on whether community-level interventions intended to increase exposure to natural environments can improve mental health and related behaviours. In the first study of its kind, we evaluated whether the implementation of a programme designed to improve the quality of, and access to, local woodlands in deprived communities in Scotland, UK, was associated with lower perceived stress or other health-related outcomes, using a controlled, repeat cross-sectional design with a nested prospective cohort. Interventions included physical changes to the woodlands and community engagement activities within the woodlands, with data collected at baseline (2013) and post-intervention (2014 and 2015). The interventions were, unexpectedly, associated with increased perceived stress compared to control sites. However, we observed significantly greater increases in stress for those living >500 m from intervention sites. Visits to nearby nature (woods and other green space) increased overall, and moderate physical activity levels also increased. In the intervention communities, those who visited natural environments showed smaller increases in stress than those who did not; there was also some evidence of increased nature connectedness and social cohesion. The intervention costs were modest but there were no significant changes in quality of life on which to base cost-effectiveness. Findings suggest factors not captured in the study may have contributed to the perceived stress patterns found. Wider community engagement and longer post-intervention follow-up may be needed to achieve significant health benefits from woodland interventions such as those described here. The study points to the challenges in evidencing the effectiveness of green space and forestry interventions to enhance health in urban environments, but also to potential benefits from more integrated approaches across health and landscape planning and management practice.

Keywords: Natural environment; mental health; stress; deprived urban communities; quasi-experimental; natural environment interventions; forestry; woodlands; community forest management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3317/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3317/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:12:p:3317-:d:240171

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:12:p:3317-:d:240171