EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Recycling Agricultural Wastes and By-products in Organic Farming: Biofertilizer Production, Yield Performance and Carbon Footprint Analysis

Mariangela Diacono, Alessandro Persiani, Elena Testani, Francesco Montemurro and Corrado Ciaccia
Additional contact information
Mariangela Diacono: Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria—Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Via Celso Ulpiani 5, 70125 Bari, Italy
Alessandro Persiani: Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria—Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Via Celso Ulpiani 5, 70125 Bari, Italy
Elena Testani: Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria—Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Via della Navicella 2-4, 00184 Roma (RM), Italy
Francesco Montemurro: Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria—Research Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Via Salaria 1, 63030 Monsampolo del Tronto (AP), Italy
Corrado Ciaccia: Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria—Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Via della Navicella 2-4, 00184 Roma (RM), Italy

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 14, 1-17

Abstract: The Circular Economy concept implies the re-design of existing production systems in agriculture, by promoting agricultural waste recycling. In an organic zucchini—lettuce rotation, two different agroecological tools were considered: biofertilizer and presence or absence of green manure (GM+ and GM−). In particular, we compared: (i) anaerobic digestate from cattle manure, co-composted with vegetable wastes, with the presence of GM (AD GM+); (ii) olive pomace compost, re-composted, with the presence of GM (OWC GM+); (iii) municipal waste compost with GM (MWC GM+); (iv) municipal waste compost without GM (MWC GM−). These materials were tested with a commercial organic fertilizer without GM (COF GM−) as a positive control. The objectives were: (i) assessing the environmental sustainability of biofertilizers through carbon footprint analysis by greenhouse gas—GHG—emissions; (ii) evaluating the agronomic performance on the vegetable rotation, by energy output assessment. The total carbon emissions of biofertilizers production was 63.9 and 67.0 kg of CO 2 eq Mg −1 for AD and OWC, respectively. The co-composting and re-composting processes emitted 31.4 and 8.4 kg CO 2 per Mg of compost, respectively. In AD the ventilation phase of composting accounted for 37.2% of total emissions. The total CO 2 emission values for the two-crop cycles were the highest in COF GM− and the lowest in OWC GM+, due to different fertilizer sources. On the average of the treatments, the input that induced the highest CO 2 emission was irrigation (37.9%). The energy output assessment for zucchini and lettuce highlighted similar performance for all the treatments. Our findings demonstrated the validity of the tested processes to recycle agro-industrial wastes, and the potential of agroecological practices (GM) to mitigate GHG emissions.

Keywords: anaerobic digestate; co-composting; olive pomace compost; municipal waste compost; circular economy; environmental sustainability; Mediterranean environment; climate change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/14/3824/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/14/3824/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:14:p:3824-:d:247947

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-18
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:14:p:3824-:d:247947