Social Sustainability Assessment in Livestock Production: A Social Life Cycle Assessment Approach

Adriana Rivera-Huerta, María de la Salud Rubio Lozano, Alejandro Padilla-Rivera and Leonor Patricia Güereca
Additional contact information
Adriana Rivera-Huerta: Instituto de Ingenieria, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico 04510, Mexico
María de la Salud Rubio Lozano: Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico 04510, Mexico
Alejandro Padilla-Rivera: Instituto de Ingenieria, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico 04510, Mexico
Leonor Patricia Güereca: Instituto de Ingenieria, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico 04510, Mexico

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 16, 1-22

Abstract: This study evaluates the social performance of monoculture (MC), intensive silvopastoral (ISP), and native silvopastoral (NSP) livestock production systems in the tropical region of southeastern Mexico through a social life cycle assessment (SCLA) approach. The methodological framework proposed by the United Nations Environmental Program/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (UNEP/SETAC) (2009) was employed based on a scoring approach with a performance scale ranging from 1 (very poor) to 4 (outstanding). Twelve livestock ranches for calf production were evaluated using 18 impact subcategories associated with the categories “human rights”, “working conditions”, “health and safety”, “socioeconomic repercussions”, and “governance”. The stakeholders evaluated were workers, the local community, society, and value chain actors. The ranches had performance scores between 1.78 (very poor) and 2.17 (poor). The overall average performance of the ranches by production system was 1.98, 1.96, and 1.97 for the MC, ISP, and NSP systems, respectively. The statistical analysis shows that there is no significant difference in the social performance of the livestock production systems. This assessment indicates that the cattle ranches analyzed in Mexico have poor or very poor social performance. The results show that socioeconomic and political contexts exert a greater influence on the social performance of livestock production systems than does their type of technology.

Keywords: social sustainability; livestock production systems; social life cycle assessment; tropical livestock; monoculture; silvopastoral (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4419/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4419/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4419-:d:257886

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().