Is Agricultural Emissions Mitigation on the Menu for Tea Drinkers?

Rebecca Boehm, Hannah Kitchel, Selena Ahmed, Anaya Hall, Colin M. Orians, John Richard Stepp, Al Robbat, Jr., Timothy S. Griffin and Sean Cash
Additional contact information
Rebecca Boehm: Food and Environment Program, Union of Concerned Scientists, 1825 K Street NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20006, USA
Hannah Kitchel: Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, 150 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02111, USA
Selena Ahmed: College of Education, Health and Human Development, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
Anaya Hall: Energy and Resources Group, University of California at Berkeley, 310 Barrows Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-3050, USA
Colin M. Orians: Department of Biology, Tufts University, Robinson Hall, Room 364, 200 College Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USA
John Richard Stepp: Department of Anthropology, 1112 Turlington Hall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-7350, USA
Al Robbat, Jr.: Department of Chemistry, Sensory and Science Center, Tufts University, 200 Boston Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USA
Timothy S. Griffin: Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, 150 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02111, USA

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 18, 1-20

Abstract: Consumers are increasingly concerned about the environmental and social impacts of their purchases. Prior research has assessed willingness to pay (WTP) for environmental and ethical attributes on foods and beverages such as locally grown, fairly traded, and organically produced. However, few studies have examined WTP for agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation, especially in the U.S. and to date, no prior study has examined how knowledge or concerns about climate change motivate WTP for climate-friendly products. The objective of this study was to estimate WTP for agricultural GHG mitigation and examine variability in WTP across consumer characteristics, climate change knowledge and risk perception. A sensory-grounded choice experiment and survey assessing climate change knowledge and risk perception was administrated to specialty food and beverage shoppers in the Midwest and Northeastern U.S. Male and lower-income participants, as well as those at the Midwestern study site were willing to pay a higher premium for agricultural GHG mitigation, relative to females, higher income participants, and those in the Northeastern U.S. Knowledge of climate change and level of concerns for the risks it poses were not significantly associated with increased WTP for agricultural GHG mitigation. This suggests that if consumer demand is going to play a role in driving agricultural GHG mitigation, motivations for such purchasing behavior must be more fully understood.

Keywords: climate change; willingness to pay; climate change knowledge and risk perception; greenhouse gas emission labels; choice experiment; latent class analysis; carbon footprint (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/4883/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/4883/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4883-:d:264736

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().