Theoretical Model of Environmental Justice and Environmental Inequality in China’s Four Major Economic Zones

Qi He, Ran Wang, Han Ji, Gaoyang Wei, Jincheng Wang and Jingwen Liu
Additional contact information
Qi He: Research Institute for Global Value Chains, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
Ran Wang: Research Institute for Global Value Chains, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
Han Ji: Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Gaoyang Wei: Research Institute for Global Value Chains, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
Jincheng Wang: Research Institute for Global Value Chains, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
Jingwen Liu: Research Institute for Global Value Chains, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 21, 1-19

Abstract: With the change in China’s social structure and the emergence of the middle class, severe environmental pollution is stimulating the demand for social environmental justice in China. Facing the absence of environmental justice theory and related empirical research in China, this article introduces a general equilibrium theory model of environmental justice. It proves that under Pareto efficiency, environmental justice is difficult to achieve in a competitive market, and environmental inequality is the normal state. An econometric model is established based on demographic and socioeconomic factors, comparison with the US principle of environmental justice, and characteristic perspectives in the Chinese context. The study takes 444 counties in China’s four major economic zones, the Yangtze River Delta, Pearl River Delta, Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei, and Chengdu–Chongqing, as the units for empirical analysis of the regional distribution of environmental inequality. The results indicate that rural residents bear higher environmental risks than urban residents. There are different environmentally vulnerable groups and environmental disparities among the four economic zones; notably, minorities in the Pearl River Delta, poor residents in Chengdu–Chongqing, and rural residents in the Yangtze River Delta bear the environmental inequality caused by industrial gas pollution. However, migrants, including rural migrants, do not disproportionately suffer environmental risks caused by industrial pollution at the county level. This paper provides theoretical support and a systematic analytical framework for the study of China’s environmental justice issues. We describe China’s environmental inequality status and provide a reference for the design of environmental justice interventions.

Keywords: environmental justice; environmental inequality; unit-based analysis; economic zone; China; industrial pollution sources (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/5923/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/5923/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:5923-:d:280032

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().