EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparing the Environmental Impacts of Meatless and Meat-Containing Meals in the United States

Alexi Ernstoff (), Qingshi Tu (), Mireille Faist (), Andrea Del Duce (), Sarah Mandlebaum () and Jon Dettling ()
Additional contact information
Alexi Ernstoff: Quantis, EPFL Innovation Park-Bâtiment D, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Qingshi Tu: Quantis, 240 Commercial Street #3B, Boston, MA 02109, USA
Mireille Faist: Quantis, Konradstrasse 52, 8005 Zürich, Switzerland
Andrea Del Duce: Quantis, Konradstrasse 52, 8005 Zürich, Switzerland
Sarah Mandlebaum: Quantis, 240 Commercial Street #3B, Boston, MA 02109, USA
Jon Dettling: Quantis, 240 Commercial Street #3B, Boston, MA 02109, USA

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 22, 1-14

Abstract: This study compares the environmental impacts of meatless and meat-containing meals in the United States according to consumption data in order to identify commercial opportunities to lower environmental impacts of meals. Average consumption of meal types (breakfast, lunch, dinner) were assessed using life cycle assessment. Retail and consumer wastes, and weight losses and gains through cooking, were used to adjust the consumption quantities to production quantities. On average, meatless meals had more than a 40% reduction in environmental impacts than meat-containing meals for any of the assessed indicators (carbon footprint, water use, resource consumption, health impacts of pollution, and ecosystem quality). At maximum and minimum for carbon footprint, meat-containing dinners were associated with 5 kgCO 2 e and meatless lunches 1 kg CO 2 e. Results indicate that, on average in the US, meatless meals lessen environmental impacts in comparison to meat-containing meals; however, animal products (i.e., dairy) in meatless meals also had a substantial impact. Findings suggest that industrial interventions focusing on low-impact meat substitutes for dinners and thereafter lunches, and low-impact dairy substitutes for breakfasts, offer large opportunities for improving the environmental performance of the average diet.

Keywords: diets; life cycle assessment; vegetarian (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 O13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6235/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6235/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6235-:d:284397

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Prof. Dr. Marc A. Rosen

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI, Open Access Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by XML Conversion Team ().

 
Page updated 2020-01-14
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6235-:d:284397