Economic Productivity vs. Ecological Protection in Danube Floodplain. Case Study: Danube’s Sector between Olt and Vedea

Iuliana Vijulie, Mihaela Preda, Ana Irina Lequeux-Dincă, Roxana Cuculici, Elena Matei, Alina Mareci, Gabriela Manea and Anca Tudoricu
Additional contact information
Iuliana Vijulie: Faculty of Geography, Bucharest University, N. Bălcescu, 1, 010041 Bucharest, Romania
Mihaela Preda: Faculty of Geography, Bucharest University, N. Bălcescu, 1, 010041 Bucharest, Romania
Ana Irina Lequeux-Dincă: Faculty of Geography, Bucharest University, N. Bălcescu, 1, 010041 Bucharest, Romania
Roxana Cuculici: Faculty of Geography, Bucharest University, N. Bălcescu, 1, 010041 Bucharest, Romania
Elena Matei: Faculty of Geography, Bucharest University, N. Bălcescu, 1, 010041 Bucharest, Romania
Alina Mareci: Faculty of Geography, Bucharest University, N. Bălcescu, 1, 010041 Bucharest, Romania
Gabriela Manea: Faculty of Geography, Bucharest University, N. Bălcescu, 1, 010041 Bucharest, Romania
Anca Tudoricu: Faculty of Geography, Bucharest University, N. Bălcescu, 1, 010041 Bucharest, Romania

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 22, 1-20

Abstract: For a long time, wetlands were perceived as non-productive areas and were drained in an attempt to increase Romania’s agricultural surface, without acknowledging their ecological functions. This paper aims to identify possible ecological restoration models for the Danube floodplain according to the principles of sustainable development and the needs of the population living and working here. The research methodology included direct field observation, GIS techniques, and the survey method. The analysis proved the need for achieving the ecological restoration of this area while ensuring a harmonious relationship between nature and economic activities. After evaluating the views of local decision-making actors, different groups of stakeholders with divergent opinions emerged. While owners of agricultural holdings and agriculture experts pleaded for maintaining the status quo, NGOs voted for complete ecological restoration, and landowners with small farms, local authorities’ representatives, and environmental experts argued for partial ecological restoration. The study emphasises that the ecological restoration of the Danube floodplain is necessary but only possible through a consensus between the existing stakeholders and done based on the principles of sustainable development (conserving its biodiversity, protection against floods, economic activities).

Keywords: wetlands; ecological restoration; agriculture; ecology; sustainable development; Danube floodplain; Romania (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6391/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6391/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6391-:d:286671

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().