Perceptions vs. Practice: A Longitudinal Analysis of Energy-Efficient and Energy Conservation Practices in Minnesota’s Tourism Industry

Madeleine Orr, Xinyi Qian, Ingrid Schneider, Michelle Heyn and Patrick Simmons
Additional contact information
Madeleine Orr: Sport Management Department, State University of New York Cortland, Cortland, NY 13045, USA
Xinyi Qian: Tourism Center, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA
Ingrid Schneider: Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA
Michelle Heyn: Natural Resources Science & Management, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA
Patrick Simmons: Explore Minnesota Tourism, St Paul, MN 55101, USA

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 23, 1-15

Abstract: The importance of adopting sustainable practices in the tourism industry is well established. This project assessed tourism professionals’ perceptions of constraints and benefits to sustainable practices as well as actual implementation of energy practices across time. Adopting a longitudinal approach, perceptions and practices were tracked through an Internet-based questionnaire administered among tourism professionals in 2007, 2010, and 2013 in a Midwestern U.S. state. Professionals consistently agreed that attracting new clientele, improving consumer perceptions, and organizational image were benefits of sustainable practices, while initial financial costs constrained implementation. The most frequently implemented energy practices were using daylight and compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs). Only the use of two energy practices increased across time: using CFLs and Energy Star equipment. Overall, the adoption of sustainable practices was varied, and implementation rates remained minimally changed between 2007 and 2013. Reasons for the varied adoption and lack of changes in practice implementation may be explained by perceived barriers to implementation, lack of perceived benefits, and socio-economic contextual factors. With consideration to institutional theory and organizational capacity, industry and organizational-level implications are presented.

Keywords: institutional theory; organizational capacity; constraints (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6741/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6741/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6741-:d:291682

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().