Effects of Substrate on Movement Patterns and Behavior of Stream Fish through Culverts: An Experimental Approach

Kyla Johnson, Lindsay E. Wait, Suzanne K. Monk, Russell Rader, Rollin H. Hotchkiss and Mark C. Belk
Additional contact information
Kyla Johnson: Department of Biology, 4102 LSB, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
Lindsay E. Wait: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
Suzanne K. Monk: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
Russell Rader: Department of Biology, 4102 LSB, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
Rollin H. Hotchkiss: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
Mark C. Belk: Department of Biology, 4102 LSB, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 2, 1-13

Abstract: Culverts can provide a significant barrier to fish passage by fragmenting fish habitats and impeding the passage success of small-bodied fish. Geographical connectivity is critical to the maintenance of diverse fish assemblages. Culverts with high cross-sectional velocity can cause population fragmentation by impeding passage of small, freshwater fish. Behavioral responses of small fish to high velocities can differ among functional groups, and swimming behavior of many species is not well known. We tested effects of substrate type on swimming behavior in two small, freshwater fish species—southern leatherside chub ( Lepidomeda aliciae , a midwater species), and longnose dace ( Rhinichthys cataractae , a benthic species)—across three substrate treatments: (1) a bare flume, (2) large flow obstacles, and (3) a natural cobble substrate. Both longnose dace and southern leatherside chub used paths of low velocity and swam in the near-substrate boundary area. Fish in the bare flume and large obstacle treatments swam along the corners of the flume in a straight swim path, whereas fish in the natural substrate treatment used all parts of the flume bed. There was no relationship between passage success of fish and substrate type, fish species, or their interaction. In contrast, substrate type, fish species, and their interaction were significant predictors of passage time. Southern leatherside chub passed through the test section about two to four times faster than longnose dace. Both species took longer to pass through the large flow obstacle treatment compared to the bare flume or natural substrate. The natural substrate created a complex velocity profile with areas of low velocity throughout the entire flume, in contrast to the other two treatments. Our data suggest natural substrates can improve the passage of small fish in high-velocity culverts for both benthic and midwater functional groups.

Keywords: fish passage; culvert hydraulics; native fishes; velocity refuge; substrate size (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/470/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/470/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:470-:d:198506

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().