Comparative Analysis of the Energy and CO 2 Emissions Performance and Technology Gaps in the Agglomerated Cities of China and South Korea

Na Wang and Yongrok Choi
Additional contact information
Na Wang: Global E-governance Program, Inha University, Incheon 402751, Korea
Yongrok Choi: Global E-governance Program, Inha University, Incheon 402751, Korea

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 2, 1-25

Abstract: This paper presents a comparative analysis of the technology gap, energy efficiency, and CO 2 emission performance of the agglomerated cities in Eastern and Central China and South Korea under economic heterogeneity. The potential reductions of energy and CO 2 emission are estimated from agglomerated city perspectives. The global meta-frontier non-radial direction distance function is used to conduct an empirical analysis of agglomerated cities among Eastern, Central China and South Korea. The results show the potential reduction of 7.58 billion tons of CO 2 emissions in Korea and another potential reduction of 1930.62 toe energy for the research period in China, if Korea and China proactively collaborate with each other. The empirical results conclude several unique findings and their implications. First, there are significant differences between the Chinese and Korean cities, in energy efficiency, CO 2 emission performance, and meta-technology gaps. Korean cities play a leading role at benchmarking efficiency level with meta-frontier technology. Second, there is no significant difference between total-factor and single-factor performance indexes in the Korean cities, because South Korea requires large capital stocks to replace energy in the production process. However, the opposite is true for Eastern and Central China cities. Finally, there is huge potential for the Chinese cities to reduce energy and CO 2 emissions by “catching up” internally as well as by the collaborative efforts with Korean cities.

Keywords: global meta-frontier non-radial direction distance function; energy efficiency; CO 2 emission performance; benchmark; potential CO 2 emission and energy reduction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/475/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/475/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:475-:d:198553

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().