Does China’s Anti-Poverty Relocation and Settlement Program Benefit Ecosystem Services: Evidence from a Household Perspective

Cong Li, Bowei Kang, Lei Wang, Shuzhuo Li, Marcus Feldman and Jie Li
Additional contact information
Cong Li: School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710049, China
Bowei Kang: School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710049, China
Lei Wang: School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710049, China
Shuzhuo Li: Institute for Population and Development Studies, School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710049, China
Marcus Feldman: Department of Biology, Stanford University, 371 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305-5020, USA
Jie Li: Institute for Population and Development Studies, School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710049, China

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 3, 1-16

Abstract: To assess whether and to what extent the anti-poverty relocation and settlement program (APRSP) in China will be able to resolve the development dilemma of ecosystem conservation and human wellbeing, it is important to study the effects of policy on rural households in terms of the income generation from ecosystem services (ES). We constructed an index of dependence on ecosystem services (IDES) to evaluate the dependence of households’ net income generation on ecosystem services. Using data collected from South Shaanxi Province, we examined the effects of the relocation program on rural households’ IDES. We find that this relocation may benefit the ecosystem by significantly decreasing participants’ IDES. Relocation households have higher net incomes than non-relocation households from total ecosystem services, provisioning services, regulating services, and cultural services as well as socio-economic activities. There are significant differences in IDES between groups with different relocation and resettlement characteristics. The anti-poverty relocation program optimized the rural households’ income structure by increasing the proportion of income from socio-economic activities while reducing the proportion of income from ecosystem services. This study provides new evidence for evaluating eco-conservation and development policies by linking ecosystem services and human well-being at a micro scale. We also address the policy implications of our analysis for anti-poverty relocation programs.

Keywords: anti-poverty relocation and settlement program (APRSP); ecosystem services (ES); index of dependence on ecosystem services (IDES); rural households; South Shaanxi Province (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/600/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/600/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:600-:d:200268

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().