EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Rating the Raters: Evaluating how ESG Rating Agencies Integrate Sustainability Principles

Elena Escrig-Olmedo, María Ángeles Fernández-Izquierdo, Idoya Ferrero-Ferrero, Juana María Rivera-Lirio and María Jesús Muñoz-Torres
Additional contact information
Elena Escrig-Olmedo: Sustainability of Organizations and CSR Management Research Group-IUDESP, University Jaume I, Campus del Riu Sec-Avda. Vicent Sos Baynat s/n, Castellón 12071, Spain
María Ángeles Fernández-Izquierdo: Sustainability of Organizations and CSR Management Research Group-IUDESP, University Jaume I, Campus del Riu Sec-Avda. Vicent Sos Baynat s/n, Castellón 12071, Spain
Idoya Ferrero-Ferrero: Sustainability of Organizations and CSR Management Research Group-IUDESP, University Jaume I, Campus del Riu Sec-Avda. Vicent Sos Baynat s/n, Castellón 12071, Spain
Juana María Rivera-Lirio: Sustainability of Organizations and CSR Management Research Group-IUDESP, University Jaume I, Campus del Riu Sec-Avda. Vicent Sos Baynat s/n, Castellón 12071, Spain
María Jesús Muñoz-Torres: Sustainability of Organizations and CSR Management Research Group-IUDESP, University Jaume I, Campus del Riu Sec-Avda. Vicent Sos Baynat s/n, Castellón 12071, Spain

Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Idoya Ferrero Ferrero

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 3, 1-16

Abstract: Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) rating agencies, acting as relevant financial market actors, should take a stand on working towards achieving a more sustainable development. In this context, the objective of this paper is, on the one hand, to understand how criteria used by ESG rating agencies in their assessment processes have evolved over the last ten years and, on the other hand, to analyze whether ESG rating agencies are contributing to fostering sustainable development by the inclusion of sustainability principles into their assessment processes and practices according to the ESG criteria. This research is based on a comparative descriptive analysis of the public information provided by the most representative ESG rating and information provider agencies in the financial market in two periods: 2008 and 2018. The findings show that ESG rating agencies have integrated new criteria into their assessment models to measure corporate performance more accurately and robustly in order to respond to new global challenges. However, a deep analysis of the criteria also shows that ESG rating agencies do not fully integrate sustainability principles into the corporate sustainability assessment process.

Keywords: Environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors; ESG rating agencies; sustainability principles; sustainable and responsible investment; sustainable development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (77)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/915/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/915/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:915-:d:204849

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-08
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:915-:d:204849