EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends

Mathis Wackernagel (), David Lin (), Mikel Evans (), Laurel Hanscom () and Peter Raven ()
Additional contact information
Mathis Wackernagel: Global Footprint Network, 426 17th Street, Suite 700, Oakland, CA 94612, USA
David Lin: Global Footprint Network, 426 17th Street, Suite 700, Oakland, CA 94612, USA
Mikel Evans: Global Footprint Network, 426 17th Street, Suite 700, Oakland, CA 94612, USA
Laurel Hanscom: Global Footprint Network, 426 17th Street, Suite 700, Oakland, CA 94612, USA
Peter Raven: Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, issue 7, 1-21

Abstract: Mainstream competitiveness and international development analyses pay little attention to the significance of a country’s resource security for its economic performance. This paper challenges this neglect, examining the economic implications of countries resource dynamics, particularly for low-income countries. It explores typologies of resource patterns in the context of those countries’ economic prospects. To begin, the paper explains why it uses Ecological Footprint and biocapacity accounting for its analysis. Data used for the analysis stem from Global Footprint Network’s 2018 edition of its National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts. Ranging from 1961 to 2014, these accounts are computed from UN data sets. The accounts track, year by year, how much biologically productive space is occupied by people’s consumption and compare this with how much productive space is available. Both demand and availability are expressed in productivity-adjusted hectares, called global hectares. Using this biophysical accounting perspective, the paper predicts countries’ future socio-economic performance. This analysis is then contrasted with a financial assessment of those countries. The juxtaposition reveals a paradox: Financial assessments seem to contradict assessments based on biophysical trends. The paper offers a way to reconcile this paradox, which also elevates the significance of biophysical country assessments for shaping successful economic policies.

Keywords: biocapacity; resource accounting; economic development; resource security; national performance; ecological footprint (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 O13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2164/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2164/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:2164-:d:221834

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Prof. Dr. Marc A. Rosen

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI, Open Access Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by XML Conversion Team ().

 
Page updated 2019-04-27
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:2164-:d:221834