EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Soil pH Responses to Simulated Acid Rain Leaching in Three Agricultural Soils

Hui Wei, Yalan Liu, Huimin Xiang, Jiaen Zhang, Saifei Li and Jiayue Yang
Additional contact information
Hui Wei: College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
Yalan Liu: College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
Huimin Xiang: College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
Jiaen Zhang: College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
Saifei Li: College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
Jiayue Yang: College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China

Sustainability, 2019, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-12

Abstract: Soil has the nature of acidity and alkalinity, mostly indicated by soil pH that could greatly affect soil ecological processes and functions. With exogenous inputs of acidic materials (such as acid rain), soils may more or less resist to maintain their pH levels within specific thresholds by various buffering processes. It has been well established that soil properties such as cation exchange capacity (CEC), soil organic matter (SOM), and clay content play important roles in mitigating the effects of acid inputs, but the factors varied across soils. This microcosm experiment was conducted to investigate changes in the soil pH and quantitatively estimate the critical pH threshold of simulated acid rain for three highly weathered soils (red soil, lateritic red soil, and latosol) that are typical soil types widely distributed across the world’s subtropical and tropical climatic zones, as well as important influential factors, after continuously adding different levels of simulated acid rain on the surface of soil cores. The results showed that the change in the soil pH was not significantly different among the three soils, although it was exponentially related to soil CEC and clay content. Resultantly, the latosol that had high soil CEC and clay content was more resistant to simulated acid rain, especially when relatively weak simulated acid rain treatments were applied. The lateritic red soil that contained the lowest soil CEC and clay content showed the greatest decline in the soil pH under the strongest simulated acid rain treatment of pH being 2.5. Furthermore, we estimated the critical pH threshold of simulated acid rain for the three soils and observed that it was considerably different among the soils. Surprisingly, the pH threshold of simulated acid rain was also positively related to the soil CEC and clay content, therefore making the highest pH threshold in the latosol. Our results imply that soil CEC and clay content may play critical roles in the soil acid-buffering processes from two aspects; it could not only contribute to the soil acid-buffering capacity, but also affect the threshold of acidity of acid rain below which abrupt soil acidification may occur.

Keywords: acid deposition; critical load; soil acid-buffering capacity; soil acidity; soil pH buffering capacity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/280/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/280/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:280-:d:303246

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:280-:d:303246