Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Alternative Energy Sources for the Western Australian Transport Sector

Najmul Hoque, Wahidul Biswas, Ilyas Mazhar and Ian Howard
Additional contact information
Najmul Hoque: School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
Wahidul Biswas: Sustainability Engineering Group, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
Ilyas Mazhar: School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
Ian Howard: School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia

Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 14, 1-33

Abstract: Environmental obligation, fuel security, and human health issues have fuelled the search for locally produced sustainable transport fuels as an alternative to liquid petroleum. This study evaluates the sustainability performance of various alternative energy sources, namely, ethanol, electricity, electricity-gasoline hybrid, and hydrogen, for Western Australian road transport using a life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) framework. The framework employs 11 triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability indicators and uses threshold values for benchmarking sustainability practices. A number of improvement strategies were devised based on the hotspots once the alternative energy sources failed to meet the sustainability threshold for the determined indicators. The proposed framework effectively addresses the issue of interdependencies between the three pillars of sustainability, which was an inherent weakness of previous frameworks. The results show that the environment-friendly and socially sustainable energy options, namely, ethanol-gasoline blend E55, electricity, electricity-E10 hybrid, and hydrogen, would need around 0.02, 0.14, 0.10, and 0.71 AUD/VKT of financial support, respectively, to be comparable to gasoline. Among the four assessed options, hydrogen shows the best performance for the environmental and social bottom line when renewable electricity is employed for hydrogen production. The economic sustainability of hydrogen fuel is, however, uncertain at this stage due to the high cost of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (HFCVs). The robustness of the proposed framework warrants its application in a wide range of alternative fuel assessment scenarios locally as well as globally.

Keywords: alternative transport fuel; triple bottom line; sustainability assessment; life cycle approach; threshold value; improvement strategies; sustainable development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5565/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5565/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:14:p:5565-:d:382790

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().