EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Institutional Design and Performance of Markets for Watershed Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Literature Review

Hao Wang (), Sander Meijerink () and Erwin van der Krabben ()
Additional contact information
Hao Wang: Institute for Management Research, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Sander Meijerink: Institute for Management Research, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Erwin van der Krabben: Institute for Management Research, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 16, 1-1

Abstract: Markets for watershed ecosystem services have been developed as a tool in integrated water resources management. The development of vast markets for watershed ecosystem services has raised attention for the performance of these markets, their institutional design, and how their institutional design influences market performance. The main research questions guiding this systematic literature review are: Which types of markets can be distinguished; how is market performance operationalized; which institutional design characteristics are distinguished in the literature; and which of these characteristics are crucial to understanding performance? A systematic review of 224 journal articles from Web of Science leads to several main findings regarding these questions. Market performance is usually equated with effectiveness in the reviewed articles. Discussions in these articles include whether the market contributes to the preservation of ecosystem services, what the distributional impacts are, and what the participation rate is. The reviewed articles have illustrated specific institutional design features as well. The key features include the security of property rights, role of governments, bundling of ecosystem services (ES), and role of trust. In those articles addressing the relationship between institutional design and performance, the relevance of monitoring and enforcement, clearly defined property rights, and geographical market scope have been pointed out.

Keywords: institutional design; performance; ecosystem services; market; systematic literature review (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 O13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6382/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6382/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6382-:d:396083

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Prof. Dr. Marc A. Rosen

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI, Open Access Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by XML Conversion Team ().

 
Page updated 2021-01-05
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6382-:d:396083