Assessment of SDG Indicator 11.3.1 and Urban Growth Trends of Major and Small Cities in South Africa
Naledzani Mudau,
Dennis Mwaniki,
Lesiba Tsoeleng,
Morwapula Mashalane,
Donatien Beguy and
Robert Ndugwa
Additional contact information
Naledzani Mudau: South African National Space Agency, Pretoria 0087, South Africa
Dennis Mwaniki: Data and Analytics Unit, UN-Habitat, P.O. Box 30030, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
Lesiba Tsoeleng: South African National Space Agency, Pretoria 0087, South Africa
Morwapula Mashalane: South African National Space Agency, Pretoria 0087, South Africa
Donatien Beguy: Data and Analytics Unit, UN-Habitat, P.O. Box 30030, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
Robert Ndugwa: Data and Analytics Unit, UN-Habitat, P.O. Box 30030, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 17, 1-18
Abstract:
Geospatial technologies play an important role in understanding and monitoring of land cover and land use change which is critical in achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 11 and related goals. In this study, we assessed SDG Indicator 11.3.1, Ratio of Land Consumption Rate to Population Growth Rate (LCRPGR) and other urban growth trends of four cities in South Africa using Landsat 5 TM and SPOT 2&5 satellite images and census data collected in 1996, 2001 and 2011. The 2011 built-up areas were mapped using South Africa’s SPOT 5 Global Human Settlements Layer (GHSL) system whereas the 1996 and 2001 built-up areas were extracted from Landsat 5 and SPOT 2 satellite imagery using a kNN object-based image analysis technique that uses textural and radiometric features. We used the built-up area layer to calculate the land consumption per capita and total urban change for each city, both of which have been identified as being important explanatory indicators for the ratio of LCRPGR. The assessment shows that the two major cities, Johannesburg and Tshwane, recorded a decline in the ratio of LCRPGR between the periods 1996–2001 and 2001–2011. In contrast, the LCRPGR ratios for secondary cities, Polokwane and Rustenburg increased during the same periods. The results further show that Tshwane recorded an increase in land consumption per capita between 1996 and 2001 followed by a decrease between 2001 and 2011. Over the same time, Johannesburg experienced a gradual decrease in land consumption per capita. On the other hand, Polokwane and Rustenburg recorded a unique growth trend, in which the overall increase in LCRPGR was accompanied by a decrease in land consumption per capita. In terms of land consumption, Tshwane experienced the highest urban growth rate between 1996 and 2001, whereas Johannesburg and Polokwane experienced the highest urban growth rates between 2001 and 2011. The information derived in this study shows the significance of Indicator 11.3.1 in understanding the urbanization trends in cities of different sizes in South Africa and creates a baseline for nationwide assessment of SDG 11.3.1.
Keywords: sustainable development goals; SDG 11; LCRPGR; indicator 11.3.1; South Africa; land consumption; earth observation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7063/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7063/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7063-:d:406081
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().