Measuring What Is Not Seen—Transparency and Good Governance Nonprofit Indicators to Overcome the Limitations of Accounting Models

Antonio Luis Moreno-Albarracín, Ana Licerán-Gutierrez, Cristina Ortega-Rodríguez, Álvaro Labella and Rosa M. Rodríguez
Additional contact information
Antonio Luis Moreno-Albarracín: Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, University of Jaén, Paraje Las Lagunillas, s/n, E-23071 Jaén, Spain
Ana Licerán-Gutierrez: Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, University of Jaén, Paraje Las Lagunillas, s/n, E-23071 Jaén, Spain
Cristina Ortega-Rodríguez: Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, University of Jaén, Paraje Las Lagunillas, s/n, E-23071 Jaén, Spain
Álvaro Labella: Department of Computer Science, University of Jaén, Paraje Las Lagunillas, s/n, E-23071 Jaén, Spain
Rosa M. Rodríguez: Department of Computer Science, University of Jaén, Paraje Las Lagunillas, s/n, E-23071 Jaén, Spain

Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 18, 1-20

Abstract: One of the most complex challenges currently faced by non-profit organizations (NPOs) is demonstrating that they manage resources with the highest levels of efficiency and excellence, and do not deviate from the accomplishment of their mission. Transparency and good governance are highly valuable issues for the survival of these organizations. However, empirical studies and models to measure these concepts are scarce and lack consensus. The objective of this article is to develop a uniform procedure for measuring the levels of transparency and good governance in NPOs, validated by experts, that integrates the most important contributions. The main proposals are supported by lists of indicators whose compliance they try to verify. Finally, we considered the experts’ preferences to obtain the indicator weights by means of the Best–Worst Method and Minimum Cost Consensus model. The result of our work is the development of a list of indicators, which integrates the existing battery of Spanish indicators. We contribute, with this work, to improving the credibility of the third sector from the perspective of donors, users, public administrations, and society. This is an essential issue for the survival of these NPOs.

Keywords: third sector; non-profit organization (NPO); transparency; good governance; accountability; batteries of indicators; Best-Worst Method (BWM); minimum cost consensus (MCC) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7275/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7275/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7275-:d:409037

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().