Perception of Nature’s Contributions to People in Rural Communities in the Eastern Amazon
Rafael Melo de Brito,
Valente José Matlaba,
Vera Lúcia Imperatriz-Fonseca and
Tereza Cristina Giannini
Additional contact information
Rafael Melo de Brito: Instituto Tecnológico Vale, Rua Boaventura da Silva, 955, Belém 66055-900, Brazil
Valente José Matlaba: Instituto Tecnológico Vale, Rua Boaventura da Silva, 955, Belém 66055-900, Brazil
Vera Lúcia Imperatriz-Fonseca: Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de S. Paulo, CEP 05508-090 São Paulo, Brazil
Tereza Cristina Giannini: Instituto Tecnológico Vale, Rua Boaventura da Silva, 955, Belém 66055-900, Brazil
Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 18, 1-21
Abstract:
Nature’s contributions to people (NCP) are increasingly being considered in decisions by policy-makers because of their relevance to the well-being of people. Learning the value of nature from the perception of communities can help to define priorities and to guide the development of public policies for environmental conservation. The objective of this study was to analyze the perception of the importance, benefits, and problems of NCP among residents of five rural communities, and their opinion about the protected areas of the municipality, considering their socioeconomic characteristics. The method consisted of conducting questionnaire-based, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with a sample of 214 randomly selected households in five rural communities of Parauapebas (Pará, Eastern Amazon). We used appropriate statistical tests for data analysis. The main results show that the communities were highly homogeneous and that 52% of the households had low income (below a minimum wage of USD 250). A high proportion of respondents gave the highest importance to all categories of NCP (2/3 of respondents for material, 3/4 for non-material, and 4/5 for regulating NCP). The most commonly mentioned benefits of NCP referred to subsistence or livelihood and quality of life (40% of total mentions). Environmental degradation problems were the most cited (38% of total mentions). Almost all respondents stated that they had a positive opinion about the protected areas of the municipality, despite underusing them. This study is relevant because it analyses, for the first time, the perceptions of NCP among residents of rural communities in the Eastern Amazon, an essential aspect for decision-and public policy-making.
Keywords: valuation; biodiversity; ecosystem services; Amazon biome; Carajás National Forest (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7665/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7665/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7665-:d:414673
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().