Horse Manure Management by Commercial and Old-Order Amish Equine Operators: Economic and Conservation Implications

Justin Dijak, Laura McCann and Caroline Brock
Additional contact information
Justin Dijak: Division of Applied Social Sciences, University of Missouri, 200 Mumford Hall, Columbia, MO 65211-6200, USA
Laura McCann: Division of Applied Social Sciences, University of Missouri, 200 Mumford Hall, Columbia, MO 65211-6200, USA
Caroline Brock: Division of Applied Social Sciences, University of Missouri, 200 Mumford Hall, Columbia, MO 65211-6200, USA

Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 20, 1-17

Abstract: Horse operations may produce high amounts of manure per acre/ha and be less aware of recommended manure management practices than livestock farmers, leading to negative environmental impacts. This study compared the manure management practices of two populations of horse owners in the USA state of Missouri, commercial horse operations and an Old-Order Amish community, using data from a 2019 mail survey with a 50% response rate. In commercial operations, manure was more likely to be piled rather than spread directly on fields, which was the Amish practice. The Amish were more likely to use manure for crop production, to indicate that was why they had not explored markets for manure, and to test soil for nutrients. Regression results for factors affecting previous sales/transfers of manure or compost showed that selling was more likely for commercial operations, female operators, and those who had composted manure. Compared to respondents who agreed that manure management had an impact on water quality, those who did not know or were neutral about that statement were more likely to have sold manure. While both groups can improve manure management and are underserved by traditional agricultural information channels, educational efforts should be tailored to their different circumstances.

Keywords: Amish; equine; horse; manure management; value-added; water quality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8723/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8723/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8723-:d:432204

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().