Sustainable Application of Livestock Water Footprints in Different Beef Production Systems of South Africa
Ayanda M. Ngxumeshe,
Motshekwe Ratsaka,
Bohani Mtileni and
Khathutshelo Nephawe
Additional contact information
Ayanda M. Ngxumeshe: Tshwane University of Technology, Faculty of Science, Department of Animal Sciences, Staatsartilerie Road, Pretoria Campus, Private Bag X680, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
Motshekwe Ratsaka: Tshwane University of Technology, Faculty of Science, Department of Animal Sciences, Staatsartilerie Road, Pretoria Campus, Private Bag X680, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
Bohani Mtileni: Tshwane University of Technology, Faculty of Science, Department of Animal Sciences, Staatsartilerie Road, Pretoria Campus, Private Bag X680, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
Khathutshelo Nephawe: Tshwane University of Technology, Faculty of Science, Department of Animal Sciences, Staatsartilerie Road, Pretoria Campus, Private Bag X680, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 23, 1-13
Abstract:
There is an increase in requirement and competition for water, while water resources are decreasing at an accelerating rate. Agriculture is the biggest consumer of water and therefore has the largest water footprint, which is not yet known. The largest portion is acknowledged to be for producing animal products. Water footprints account for the amounts of water used to produce a commodity for consumption, measured along the commodity life cycle. Water withdrawals from surface and groundwater are accounted for when assessing the water footprint. The three identified major determinants of a water footprint of meat include feed conversion efficiency (FCE), feed composition, and feed origin, with the first two being influenced greatly by the animal production system. In South Africa (SA), the two distinct production systems are the intensive and extensive production systems. Intensifying beef animals improves FCE due to faster growths per kg feed consumed, reduced activity, and therefore reduced water footprint. Beef cattle in the extensive system consume a large component of roughages, while the intensive system has a high concentrate to roughage ratio. This theoretically increases the water footprint in the intensive system. The literature indicates large amounts of volumetric water footprint indicators of boneless beef in SA. Water footprint assessment is critical for enabling consumers to make well-informed and sound decisions when considering changes in their behavior due to the effect this has on social, economic, and environmental wellbeing. This paper aims to postulate the various issues associated with water usage in beef production. These include factors affecting the water footprint of beef production and the effects it has on various aspects of both the environment and social wellbeing. It further explores the various methods to assess the water footprint of a product.
Keywords: Water use; production system; animal feed; drinking water (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/9921/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/9921/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:9921-:d:452136
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().