Mind the Gap: Towards a Typology of Climate Service Usability Gaps

Kevin Raaphorst, Gerben Koers, Gerald Jan Ellen, Amy Oen, Bjørn Kalsnes, Lisa van Well, Jana Koerth and Rutger van der Brugge
Additional contact information
Kevin Raaphorst: Department of Geography, Planning and Environment, Radboud University, 6525XZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Gerben Koers: Department of Urban Water and Subsurface, Deltares, 3584BK Utrecht, The Netherlands
Gerald Jan Ellen: Department of Urban Water and Subsurface, Deltares, 3584BK Utrecht, The Netherlands
Amy Oen: Department of Risk, Slope stability and Climate adaptation, NGI, N-0855 Oslo, Norway
Bjørn Kalsnes: Department of Risk, Slope stability and Climate adaptation, NGI, N-0855 Oslo, Norway
Lisa van Well: Department of Geotechnical risk and climate adaptation, SGI, SE-581 93 Linköping, Sweden
Jana Koerth: Coastal Risks and Sea-Level Rise Research Group, University of Kiel, 24118 Kiel, Germany
Rutger van der Brugge: Department of Urban Water and Subsurface, Deltares, 3584BK Utrecht, The Netherlands

Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 4, 1-21

Abstract: Literature on climate services presents a large diversity of different services and uses. Many climate services have ‘usability gaps’: the information provided, or the way it is visualized, may be unsuitable for end users to inform decision-making processes in relation to adaptation against climate change impacts or for the development of policies to this end. The aim of this article is to contribute to more informed and efficient decision-making processes in climate adaptation by developing a typology of usability gaps for climate services. To do so, we first present and demonstrate a so-called ‘climate information design’ (CID) template with which to study and potentially improve the visual communicative qualities of climate services. Then, two climates services are selected for a further, qualitative explorative case study of two cases in the north and south of the Netherlands. A combination of focus group sessions and semi-structured interviews are used to collect data from Dutch governmental stakeholders as well as private stakeholders and NGOs. This data is then coded to discover what usability gaps are present. We then present twelve different types of usability gaps that were encountered as a typology. This typology could be used to improve and redesign climate services.

Keywords: climate services; spatial planning; climate adaptation; visual communication; information design; stakeholder involvement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1512/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1512/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1512-:d:322066

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().