Expanding the Scope of the Bicycle Level-of-Service Concept: A Review of the Literature

Khashayar Kazemzadeh, Aliaksei Laureshyn, Lena Winslott Hiselius and Enrico Ronchi
Additional contact information
Khashayar Kazemzadeh: Transport and Roads, Department of Technology and Society, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Box118, 22100 Lund, Sweden
Aliaksei Laureshyn: Transport and Roads, Department of Technology and Society, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Box118, 22100 Lund, Sweden
Lena Winslott Hiselius: Transport and Roads, Department of Technology and Society, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Box118, 22100 Lund, Sweden
Enrico Ronchi: Transport and Roads, Department of Technology and Society, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Box118, 22100 Lund, Sweden

Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 7, 1-30

Abstract: Research into the bicycle level-of-service (BLOS) has been extensively conducted over the last three decades. This research has mostly focused on user perceptions of comfort to provide guidance for decision-makers and planners. Segments and nodes were studied first, followed by a network evaluation. Besides these investigations, several variables have also been utilized to depict the users’ perspectives within the BLOS field, along with other cycling research domains that simultaneously scrutinized the users’ preferences. This review investigates the variables and indices employed in the BLOS area in relation to the field of bicycle flow and comfort research. Despite general agreement among existing BLOS variables and the adopted indices, several important research gaps remain to be filled. First, BLOS indices are often categorized based on transport components, while scarce attention has been paid to BLOS studies in trip-end facilities such as bicycle parking facilities. The importance of these facilities has been highlighted instead within research related to comfort. Second, the advantages of separated bike facilities have been proven in many studies; however, scarce research has addressed the challenges associated with them (e.g., the heterogeneity within those facilities due to the presence of electric bikes and electric scooters). This issue is clearly noticeable within the research regarding flow studies. Furthermore, network evaluation (in comparison to segment and node indices) has been studied to a lesser extent, whereas issues such as connectivity can be evaluated mainly through a holistic approach to the system. This study takes one step toward demonstrating the importance of the integration of similar research domains in the BLOS field to eliminate the aforementioned shortcomings.

Keywords: bicycle; level-of-service; traffic flow; comfort; quality-of-service; cycling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2944/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2944/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2944-:d:342467

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().