(Un)Sustainable Creativity? Different Manager-Employee Perspectives in the Finnish Technology Sector

Soila Lemmetty, Vlad Petre Glăveanu, Kaija Collin and Panu Forsman
Additional contact information
Soila Lemmetty: Department of Education, University of Jyväskylä, Alvar Aallon katu 9, 40140 Jyväskylä, Finland
Vlad Petre Glăveanu: Department of Psychology and Professional Counselling, Webster University, 15 Route de Collex, 1293 Geneva, Switzerland
Kaija Collin: Department of Education, University of Jyväskylä, Alvar Aallon katu 9, 40140 Jyväskylä, Finland
Panu Forsman: Department of Education, University of Jyväskylä, Alvar Aallon katu 9, 40140 Jyväskylä, Finland

Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 9, 1-16

Abstract: The importance of creativity for working life and in organizations has increased in recent years. At the same time, the theme of sustainability has been intensely debated in research, society, and organizations. Together, creativity and sustainability have sometimes been described as a contradictory phenomenon: they are described in ways that place them in opposition to each other. To better understand creativity and sustainability and their differences from the perspective of people in different positions, we take advantage of a sociocultural approach in which we do not focus only on creative individuals but also on the impact of creativity on both organizational stakeholders and society at large. We aim to explore manager and employee descriptions of creativity and its relationship with sustainability at work in the Finnish technology sector, with a particular focus on how they relate to the sustainability of the creative processes and to workplace activities more generally. Based on a thematic analysis of 56 interviews, we found that the managers and employees in Finnish technology organizations described creativity in different ways, looking at the phenomenon from the viewpoints of clients, businesses, society, or colleagues, and had different perspectives on what it means to create, with the former treating creativity as huge innovations and the latter as daily problem-solving. We also found that sustainability in relation to creativity appears either as applying old solutions and thus recycling previous ideas or outcomes or as destroying old products and replacing them with the new (creative destruction). We discuss these partly conflicting discourses at the end of the article and present suggestions for future research.

Keywords: creativity; sustainability; Finland; technology sector; qualitative analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3605/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3605/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3605-:d:352035

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().