Defining Landscapes, and Their Importance for National Identity—A Case Study from Slovenia

Nadja Penko Seidl, Mateja Šmid Hribar, Jelka Hudoklin, Tomaž Pipan and Mojca Golobič
Additional contact information
Nadja Penko Seidl: Department of Landscape Architecture, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Mateja Šmid Hribar: Anton Melik Geographical Institute, Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Jelka Hudoklin: The Spatial Planning Department, Acer Novo mesto d.o.o, SI-8000 Novo mesto, Slovenia
Tomaž Pipan: Department of Landscape Architecture, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Mojca Golobič: Department of Landscape Architecture, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 11, 1-18

Abstract: Although each landscape has its own identity, only some of them are recognized as nationally important because of their cultural and natural values and their contribution to national identity. In Slovenia, these landscapes are listed in the national Spatial Development Strategy (adopted in 2004). However, this list was neither supported by implementation instruments nor integrated in any conservation or management policy documents and was poorly integrated into spatial plans. The aim of this research was to renew the methodology for identifying landscapes of national importance. The methods included in-depth interviews with experts, an online questionnaire, participatory workshops, and field visits. The questionnaire results showed that only eight landscapes from the original list of 62 were explicitly recognized as nationally important, which confirmed the hypothesis that the initial method was not transparent and that the criteria were biased. The proposed approach included the following criteria: (1) representativeness, (2) the quality of the landscape features, and (3) the cultural and scientific value. The methodology was accompanied with the list of landscape features and landscape types that are important for Slovenian national identity; recommendations for implementing the method on national, regional, and local levels; and the general guidelines for spatial planning and management of these landscapes.

Keywords: landscape identity; evaluation criteria; landscape features; national landscape identity; cultural landscape; Slovenia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6475/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6475/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6475-:d:570180

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().