EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Democratically Sustainable Local Development? The Outcomes of Mixed Deliberation on a Municipal Merger on Participants’ Social Trust, Political Trust, and Political Efficacy

Kim Strandberg, Kim Backström, Janne Berg and Thomas Karv
Additional contact information
Kim Strandberg: Department of Politics and Political Communication, Åbo Akademi University, 65100 Vaasa, Finland
Kim Backström: Social Science Research Institute, Åbo Akademi University, 65100 Vaasa, Finland
Janne Berg: Department of Politics and Political Communication, Åbo Akademi University, 65100 Vaasa, Finland
Thomas Karv: Social Science Research Institute, Åbo Akademi University, 65100 Vaasa, Finland

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 13, 1-17

Abstract: Municipal mergers are typically contentious and polarizing issues among both citizens and politicians. In deciding on these, municipal-level referendums are often commissioned by municipal councils. Referendums, though, are also per se polarizing processes that only exacerbate an already polarizing issue. Adding deliberation to referendum processes has been shown in previous studies to be a more democratically sustainable process than mere referendums. In this study, we explore the use of mixed deliberation between citizens and politicians within a municipal merger process in the municipality of Korsholm in Finland, one year before a referendum on the issue occurred. The deliberations were two-hour sessions in February 2018, with local politicians present in each discussion group. Using pre- and post-deliberation surveys, we trace how citizens (n = 117) engaging in deliberation developed their social trust, political trust, and political efficacy during deliberation. Generally, we expected that all of these would be strengthened in deliberation. The results, however, reveal only a few statistically significant effects, some of which ran contrary to expectations.

Keywords: mixed deliberation; referendums; municipal mergers; democratic sustainability; social trust; political trust; political efficacy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7231/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7231/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7231-:d:584043

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7231-:d:584043