EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Impact of Changing Swidden-Based Farming to Rubber-Based Farming on Food Security in Luang Namtha Province, Lao PDR

Anan Polthanee, Arunee Promkhambut, Satit Aditto and Avakat Phasouysaingam
Additional contact information
Anan Polthanee: Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
Arunee Promkhambut: Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
Satit Aditto: Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
Avakat Phasouysaingam: Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 14, 1-15

Abstract: Although swidden-based farming has traditionally been practiced by the people in Lao PDR, this system is considered to result in significant environmental degradation. Thus, rubber-based farming was introduced as an alternative to food crops grown under swidden farming, thereby affecting household food security. Thus, this study aimed to compare the impacts of traditional swidden-based farming (SBF), rubber-based farming (RBF), and swidden–rubber-based farming on food security in Luang Namtha province, Laos. Two villages were selected for a case study. A total sample of 195 households was selected using the stratified random sampling method. A face-to-face household (HH) questionnaire was used for interviews. The results showed that households practicing RBF alone showed the lowest level of food security and highest vulnerability in terms of food security. No households in this group reached the food security level. The SRBF group exhibited a greater level of food security than that of either SBF or RBF alone. Two dimensions of food security—food availability and food access—were used to investigate the household food security level associated with the three farming types in this paper.

Keywords: swidden-based farming; rubber-based farming; swidden and rubber-based farming; food security (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7617/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7617/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7617-:d:590305

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7617-:d:590305