Developing Farm-Level Social Indicators for Agri-Environment Schemes: A Focus on the Agents of Change

Jane Mills, Hannah Chiswell, Peter Gaskell, Paul Courtney, Beth Brockett, George Cusworth and Matt Lobley
Additional contact information
Jane Mills: Countryside and Community Research Institute, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham GL50 4AZ, UK
Hannah Chiswell: Countryside and Community Research Institute, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham GL50 4AZ, UK
Peter Gaskell: Countryside and Community Research Institute, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham GL50 4AZ, UK
Paul Courtney: Countryside and Community Research Institute, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham GL50 4AZ, UK
Beth Brockett: Natural England, Worcester WR5 2NP, UK
George Cusworth: Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3BD, UK
Matt Lobley: Centre for Rural Policy Research, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4PJ, UK

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 14, 1-22

Abstract: Most monitoring and evaluation programmes for agri-environment schemes focus on understanding the environmental outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of these schemes. Evaluation of the social dimensions of agri-environment schemes, particularly the socio-cultural factors that might influence the quality of engagement with the schemes and the social wellbeing impact of scheme engagement, is limited. This is a critical gap in knowledge as there is growing recognition that without more explicit consideration of the farmers involved in land management as agents of change, the required environmental improvements will not be achieved. The aim of this paper was to undertake a systematic literature review to inform the development of a set of social indicators that can be used to measure the level of farmers’ engagement with their scheme agreement and the social sustainability outcomes from participation. Following the literature review and a short-listing ranking exercise with two sets of experts, 20 high-level (composite) social indicators and associated sub-level (component) indicators were identified. A series of scale or ranking questions that can be used to capture the indicator data were also developed and tested. This paper presents the first stage in the development of a robust set of social indicators for agri-environment schemes that will also provide a good indicator of long-term environmental outcomes.

Keywords: social indicators; agri-environment; social sustainability; farmer behaviour; socio-cultural; health and wellbeing; monitoring and evaluation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7820/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7820/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7820-:d:593390

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().