EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Mask Design for Life in the Midst of COVID-19

Shuo-Fang Liu, Jui-Feng Chang and Ming-Hong Wang
Additional contact information
Shuo-Fang Liu: Department of Industrial Design, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City 701, Taiwan
Jui-Feng Chang: Department of Industrial Design, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City 701, Taiwan
Ming-Hong Wang: Department of Industrial Design, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City 701, Taiwan

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 14, 1-18

Abstract: Existing medical masks have various disadvantages, such as the environmental damage caused by disposable masks, the discomfort and poor ventilation caused by prolonged mask wearing, and the lack of aesthetic design in mass-produced masks. Thus, this study used quality function deployment, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation to research, develop, and design masks. The aforementioned methods were also used to determine the ranking of design requirements. The following priority ranking of design requirements from most to least important was obtained: reducing discomfort at the contact between the mask and the skin (0.265), avoiding foul odor inside the mask (0.187), convenient cleaning and portability (0.166), good airtightness (0.152), suitable aesthetic design for wearing in public and on social occasions (0.130), and reducing waste (0.100). Experts evaluated mask designs, and their opinions were subject to fuzzy analysis. Specifically, 50% of the experts evaluated the designs to be “good” or “very good”. Only 29% of the experts rated the design results as “average”. Thus, the innovative mask designed in this study can meet the needs of users, overcome the drawbacks of existing masks, and provide a feasible solution for the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords: COVID-19; mask design; quality function deployment (QFD); fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP); fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/8011/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/8011/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:8011-:d:596437

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:8011-:d:596437