Management of Green Intellectual Capital: Evidence-Based Literature Review and Future Directions

Paula Benevene, Ilaria Buonomo, Eric Kong, Martina Pansini and Maria Luisa Farnese
Additional contact information
Paula Benevene: Department of Human Sciences, LUMSA University, 00193 Roma, Italy
Ilaria Buonomo: Department of Human Sciences, LUMSA University, 00193 Roma, Italy
Eric Kong: School of Management & Enterprise, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
Martina Pansini: Department of Human Sciences, LUMSA University, 00193 Roma, Italy
Maria Luisa Farnese: Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 15, 1-22

Abstract: This paper presents a systematic, evidence-based review of Green Intellectual Capital (GIC) management, a construct first introduced in 2008 and increasingly recognized as a management concept in recent years. This review covers the literature on GIC from 2008 to 2020 and addresses the role played by intellectual capital as a framework to promote sustainability in organizations. With the aim of clarifying our knowledge on the application of the GIC paradigm, this paper reviews the findings on the outcomes achieved by organizations that adopt the GIC paradigm, the antecedents and possible mediation-moderation factors that enhance this process, and the contexts in which such outcomes emerge. Findings show that GIC offers a significant framework for promoting sustainability in organizations. However, even though this study underlines the increasing trend of GIC, there remains very little reliable data on the subject, particularly addressing the role played by GIC as a framework to promote sustainability in organizations. This literature review is valuable for both researchers and practitioners. From a theoretical point of view, it allows one to synthesize the outcomes of GIC to better delineate how it affects organizations and the environment. From a practical point of view, opening a debate about the actual outcomes of GIC allows one to overcome the theory–practice divide, making the value of GIC more accessible to practitioners and managers and pushing them to opt for a green shift in their organizations.

Keywords: Green Intellectual Capital; green organizational capital; green relational capital; green human capital; green intellectual capital management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8349/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8349/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8349-:d:602094

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().