The Effects of Disciplinary Composition on Virtual Learning Group Process Dynamics: Students’ Perspectives

Melinda Dincă, Anca Luștrea, Atalia Onițiu, Mariana Crașovan and Trond Berge
Additional contact information
Melinda Dincă: Department of Sociology, West University of Timișoara, Bd. Vasile Pârvan 4, 300223 Timișoara, Romania
Anca Luștrea: Department of Educational Sciences, University Clinic of Therapies and Psycho-Pedagogical Counseling, West University of Timișoara, Bd. Vasile Pârvan 4, 300223 Timișoara, Romania
Atalia Onițiu: Department of Sociology, West University of Timișoara, Bd. Vasile Pârvan 4, 300223 Timișoara, Romania
Mariana Crașovan: Department of Educational Sciences, University Clinic of Therapies and Psycho-Pedagogical Counseling, West University of Timișoara, Bd. Vasile Pârvan 4, 300223 Timișoara, Romania
Trond Berge: Department of Social Anthropology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Høgskoleringen 1, 7491 Trondheim, Norway

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 15, 1-18

Abstract: This research was conducted as a collaborative project between the West University of Timișoara (Romania) and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (Norway) to develop a transnational learning activity. The students learned in virtual collaborative study groups; developed project-based teams; shared experiences, skills, and professional competencies; and collaborated directly with their teachers, the researchers, and the labor force. Three virtual learning groups of undergraduate students ( N = 131), presenting comparable course descriptors and disciplinary group compositions, participated in the study. This study aimed to determine the effects of disciplinary composition on virtual learning group process dynamics from the students’ perspectives. This study applied a quasi-experimental between-subjects study design: quantitative methods were used to validate a research instrument and to determine statistical differences in the group process dynamic between the three groups; a qualitative method was applied to identify an in-depth understanding of the students’ perception about the group learning experience. By analyzing the group dynamics in the three settings—mono-disciplinary, cross-disciplinary, and cross-cultural—the research results show the advantages of each virtual learning composition in the group dynamic and learning outcomes in terms of group skill acquisitions. The conclusions can help teachers design virtual team compositions, a crucial stage in ensuring the achievement of desired learning outcomes.

Keywords: group dynamic; virtual study groups; cross-disciplinary; cross-cultural; international learning; higher education (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8493/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8493/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8493-:d:604365

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().