Sustainable Urban Development: A Review of Urban Sustainability Indicator Frameworks

Denis Michalina, Peter Mederly, Hans Diefenbacher and Benjamin Held
Additional contact information
Denis Michalina: Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia
Peter Mederly: Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia
Hans Diefenbacher: FEST e. V.—Protestant Institute for Interdisciplinary Research, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany
Benjamin Held: FEST e. V.—Protestant Institute for Interdisciplinary Research, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 16, 1-20

Abstract: The issue of urban sustainability is currently exceptionally up to date, and the sustainable development of cities has become an important topic on the political level. Many cities in the world are facing acute challenges concerning growing dangers to the environment and ensuring quality of life for their inhabitants. In connection with cities achieving their individual goals of sustainable development, urban sustainability indicator frameworks (USIFs) are becoming the subjects of attention. Such frameworks enable sustainability to be clearly measured and assessed. In this article, we analysed selected global and European USIFs in terms of their commonalities and differences, sustainability dimensions, thematic categories, and categorised indicators. Based on the analysis of the content of the reviewed frameworks, we compiled a list of generally recognised thematic categories within the four main dimensions of sustainable development, and we identified the key indicators of urban sustainability. Our review showed differences in the existing approaches that substantially contributed to the current inconsistencies in assessing and measuring sustainable development in cities. Our results provide an overview of this issue, e.g., to decision makers, and could concurrently serve as a generally applicable foundation for the creation of new urban sustainability indicator frameworks. We also point out the current trends and challenges in the domain of urban sustainability assessment.

Keywords: urban sustainability; sustainability assessment; sustainability indicators; urban planning; sustainable cities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9348/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9348/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9348-:d:618219

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().