A Public Bad Game Method to Study Dynamics in Socio-Ecological Systems (Part II): Results of Testing Musa-Game in Rwanda and Adding Emergence and Spatiality to the Analysis

Julissa Alexandra Galarza-Villamar, Mariette McCampbell, Andres Galarza-Villamar, Cees Leeuwis, Francesco Cecchi and John Galarza-Rodrigo
Additional contact information
Julissa Alexandra Galarza-Villamar: Knowledge, Technology and Innovation Group, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, 6708 KN Wageningen, The Netherlands
Mariette McCampbell: Knowledge, Technology and Innovation Group, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, 6708 KN Wageningen, The Netherlands
Andres Galarza-Villamar: Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL Polytechnic University, Guayaquil 090150, Ecuador
Cees Leeuwis: Knowledge, Technology and Innovation Group, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, 6708 KN Wageningen, The Netherlands
John Galarza-Rodrigo: Facultad de Ciencias Matemáticas y Físicas, Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil 090150, Ecuador

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 16, 1-27

Abstract: This article is the second in a series of two and presented findings from field-testing an experimental boardgame (Musa-game) with banana farmers in four villages in Eastern Rwanda. The conceptualization and design of the Musa-game were described in Part I. Musa-game gives insights into how farmers’ individual and collective decision-making and actions regarding management of a public bad interplay with other factors and characteristics of the socio-ecological system (SES). A public bad is a non-rivalrous, non-excludable issue that causes loss of social-welfare of individuals and communities. The method contributes contextual understanding about the emergence of phenomena that arise from the interactions between human and non-human actors. Musa-game was framed to study one public bad challenge in particular: the infectious crop disease Banana Xanthomonas Wilt disease (BXW). Findings increased the knowhow about the emergence and governance of conditions that hinder or enhance the spread of infectious diseases like BXW. Analysis of qualitative and quantitative data suggested that individual farmers’ actions were influenced by perceptions of risk, affecting both individual and collective disease management. Additionally, the used experimental treatments allowed us to evaluate the influence of communication on risk-governance strategies. It appears that a combination of possession of technical knowledge about the disease, opportunities to communicate about the disease, and a collective disease management strategy enables the best individual actions and collective performance.

Keywords: socio-ecological systems; Banana Xanthomonas Wilt; public bad; infectious diseases; games; learning; social dilemmas; digital communication (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9353/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9353/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9353-:d:618229

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().