Energy Distribution Modeling for Assessment and Optimal Distribution of Sustainable Energy for On-Grid Food, Energy, and Water Systems in Remote Microgrids

Michele J. Chamberlin, Daniel J. Sambor, Justus Karenzi, Richard Wies and Erin Whitney
Additional contact information
Michele J. Chamberlin: Alaska Center for Energy and Power (ACEP), University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA
Daniel J. Sambor: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Justus Karenzi: Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, College of Engineering and Mines, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA
Richard Wies: Professor and Department Chair, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, College of Engineering and Mines, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA
Erin Whitney: Alaska Center for Energy and Power (ACEP), University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 17, 1-26

Abstract: Food, energy, and water (FEW) are essential for human health and economic development. FEW systems are inextricably interlinked, yet individualized and variable. Consequently, an accurate assessment must include all available and proposed FEW components and their interconnections and consider scale, location, and scope. Remote Alaska locations are examples of isolated communities with limited infrastructure, accessibility, and extreme climate conditions. The resulting challenges for FEW reliability and sustainability create opportunities to obtain practical insights that may apply to other remote communities facing similar challenges. By creating energy distribution models (EDMs), a methodology is proposed, and a tool is developed to measure the impacts of renewable energy (RE) on small FEW systems connected to the microgrids of several Alaska communities. Observing the community FEW systems through an energy lens, three indices are used to measure FEW security: Energy–Water (EW), Energy–Food (EF), and Sustainable Energy (SE). The results indicate the impacts of RE on FEW infrastructure systems are highly seasonal, primarily because of the natural intermittence and seasonality of renewable resources. Overall, there is a large potential for RE integration to increase FEW security as well as a need for additional analysis and methods to further improve the resiliency of FEW systems in remote communities.

Keywords: energy–water–food nexus; sustainability; innovation; energy security; water security; information and data platforms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9511/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9511/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9511-:d:620719

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().