Developing the Ecological Footprint Assessment for a University Campus, the Component-Based Method

Salah Vaisi, Hooshmand Alizadeh, Werya Lotfi and Saleh Mohammadi
Additional contact information
Salah Vaisi: Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj 66177-15175, Iran
Hooshmand Alizadeh: Department of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj 66177-15175, Iran
Werya Lotfi: Department of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj 66177-15175, Iran
Saleh Mohammadi: Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj 66177-15175, Iran

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 17, 1-18

Abstract: Global warming has become an increasing challenge due to the impact of human activities on the environment. In this regard, university campuses with various activities and departments have a great impact on the environment. Ecological Footprint Analysis (EFA) is a natural resource depletion assessment tool, with a high level of accuracy, that measures the impact of human activities on the environment. Considering the Ecological Footprint (EF) capabilities, this study developed a method to assess the environmental impacts of a university campus using component-based parameters. The goals of the study are to explore the effective components of EF and to propose some policy guidelines to diminish the human impacts on the environment on university campuses. Five components, including natural gas and electricity consumption, water and food usage, and waste production, were measured in a survey from 2013 to 2016 at the building scale. The mean EF of the campus was 16,484 global hectares (gha). Fossil fuel energy had the highest level of environmental impact with 70.73%, followed by waste production and food and water usage with 26.87%, 1.28%, and 1.12%, respectively. The results demonstrate that the EF Index (EFI) of the case study campus was −0.82, which reveals an unsustainable performance. The EF results were illustrated on an Ecological Footprint Map (EFM), which shows the east and west parts of the camps were more unsustainable.

Keywords: sustainable development; Ecological Footprint Analysis (EFA); Biological Capacity (BC); environmental impacts; green university campuses; low carbon university campus (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9928/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9928/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9928-:d:628807

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().