Energy Costs of Reducing Industrial Sulfur Dioxide Emissions in China
Haiying Liu,
Ying Zhong and
Chunhong Zhang
Additional contact information
Haiying Liu: Center for Quantitative Economics of Jilin University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
Ying Zhong: School of Business, Faculty of Social Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
Chunhong Zhang: School of Business, Faculty of Social Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 19, 1-17
Abstract:
With increasing environmental pollution, China has instituted corresponding environmental regulations to address environmental challenges. Estimating the costs of such environmental regulations can help governments to formulate rational environmental policies. This review estimates the costs of environmental regulations based on a novel perspective of energy consumption. Using panel data for Chinese provincial regions in 2006–2015, we developed a non-parametric directional distance function and estimated different optimal energy inputs based on data envelopment analysis under two scenarios, namely, those with and without emission reduction constraints. The gap between the two groups of optimal energy inputs facilitated the estimation of the energy costs associated with reducing SO 2 (sulfur dioxide) emissions in China’s industrial sectors. The results suggest that approximately 13.40 tons of standard coal were required to reduce SO 2 emissions by 1 ton, highlighting the discrepancy between energy savings and emission reduction. The energy costs of SO 2 emission reduction were the highest in West China (18.63), followed by those in Central and Northeast China; meanwhile, those in East China were the lowest (9.91). The large differences between the energy costs of emission reduction in different regions indicated that economically underdeveloped areas have scope for improvement with respect to energy structures and innovation in the green technology field.
Keywords: emission reduction; energy cost; energy saving; energy structure; environmental regulation; green technology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10726/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10726/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10726-:d:644227
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().