Fulfillment of ESG Responsibilities and Firm Performance: A Zero-Sum Game or Mutually Beneficial
Liang Chen,
Tian Yuan,
Richard Cebula (),
Wang Shuangjin and
Maggie Foley
Additional contact information
Liang Chen: School of Economics, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China
Tian Yuan: School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
Wang Shuangjin: School of Management, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China
Maggie Foley: Davis Business School, Jacksonville University, Jacksonville, FL 32211, USA
Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 19, 1-17
Abstract:
Focusing on the 311 Chinese firms listed in the global markets from 2008 to 2019, based on the trade-off theory and the resource slack theory, using panel vector autoregressive model and panel threshold model, this paper explores the impact of fulfilling ESG responsibility on firm performance. The study reveals that in the short run, fulfilling ESG responsibility presents a “Substitution Effect,” whereas, in the long run, it presents a “Promotional Effect.” On the other hand, the improvement of firm performance has a significantly positive impact on ESG fulfillment investment, even though there is a strong hysteresis effect. Significant heterogeneity exists regarding the relationship between ESG fulfillment and firm performance. ESG fulfillment has a negative impact on firm performance in the short run, with the most affected firms being those small and mid-sized firms listed in the Mainland China markets. In the near term, the impact of firm performance on ESG fulfillment is positive, with those listed in the overseas markets and large firms being affected the most. The study reveals that firm size and the factors affiliated with ESG fulfillment tend to cause the differentiation effect in the inhibitory influence of ESG fulfillment on firm performance in the short run. This study could be used as a guideline for the social responsibilities of nonprofit organizations.
Keywords: fulfillment of ESG responsibility; firm performance; dynamic interaction; substitution effect; Promotional Effect (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10954/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10954/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10954-:d:648627
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().