Resilient Built Environment: Critical Review of the Strategies Released by the Sustainability Rating Systems in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Antonio Marotta, César Porras-Amores and Antonio Rodríguez Sánchez
Additional contact information
Antonio Marotta: Departamento de Construcciones Arquitectónicas y su Control, Escuela Técnica Superior de Edificación (UPM), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Avenida Juan de Herrera, 6, 28040 Madrid, Spain
César Porras-Amores: Departamento de Construcciones Arquitectónicas y su Control, Escuela Técnica Superior de Edificación (UPM), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Avenida Juan de Herrera, 6, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Antonio Rodríguez Sánchez: Departamento de Construcciones Arquitectónicas y su Control, Escuela Técnica Superior de Edificación (UPM), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Avenida Juan de Herrera, 6, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 20, 1-16

Abstract: Since the COVID-19 outbreak, buildings have been viewed as a facilitator of disease spread, where the three main transmission routes (contact, droplets, aerosols) are more likely to happen. However, with proper policies and measures, buildings can be better prepared for re-occupancy and beyond. This study reviews the strategies developed by several Sustainability Rating Systems (SRS, namely WELL, Fitwel and LEED) to respond to any infectious disease and ensure that building occupants protect and maintain their health. The best practices, that are similar between each SRS, highlight that the overall sustainability of the spaces increases if they are resilient. Results indicate that SRS promote a weak sustainability approach since they accept that economic development can reduce natural capitals. SRS are also characterized by an aggregated level of assessment of different criteria that does not allow to map different choices. However, the decomposition of the concept of sustainability in its three bottom lines (i.e., environmental, social and economic) shows that preventive strategies are likely to be systematically adopted as the state-of-the-art. Finally, even if the latest research points out the airborne transmission as the major infection route, the SRS lack analytical measures to address issues such as social distancing.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; respiratory disease transmission; indoor environmental quality; sustainability rating systems; green buildings; healthy buildings; LEED; WELL; Fitwel (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11164/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11164/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11164-:d:652871

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().