Life-Cycle Assessment of Fly Ash and Cenosphere-Based Geopolymer Material

Weixin Tang, Gloria Pignatta and Samad M. E. Sepasgozar
Additional contact information
Weixin Tang: Faculty of Arts, Design, and Architecture, School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Kensington, Sydney 2052, Australia
Gloria Pignatta: Faculty of Arts, Design, and Architecture, School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Kensington, Sydney 2052, Australia
Samad M. E. Sepasgozar: Faculty of Arts, Design, and Architecture, School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Kensington, Sydney 2052, Australia

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 20, 1-23

Abstract: It was widely reported in the early 2000s that geopolymer technology exhibits superior mechanical properties and lower global warming potential (GWP) over the use of ordinary Portland cement (OPC). However, a major limitation observed in the sustainability evaluation is a lack of consideration of environmental impacts from the use of industrial waste. This observation led to the purpose of this study, which is to identify the key factors throughout geopolymer production that contribute to its sustainability performance. In this paper, two geopolymers made of fly ash (G-FA) and cenospheres (G-C) were examined by mechanical testing while their sustainability impacts on a cradle-to-grave approach were investigated. The industrial waste and transport modelling impacts were given special attention in the performed life-cycle assessment. After 28 days of curing, G-FA exhibited 64.56 MPa and 6.03 MPa of compressive strength and flexural strength, respectively. G-C, with ¾ of G-FA bulk density, achieved 19.09 MPa and 3.13 MPa, respectively, with no significant changes observed after 14 days of curing. By upscaling the inventories to 1 m 3 of industrial production scale, geopolymers showed a GWP reduction up to 49.7% compared to OPC with natural aggregates and presented benefits on human health damage category by 23.7% (G-FA) to 41.6% (G-C). In conclusion, geopolymer mortars establish compressive strength and flexural strength that are adequate for construction applications and present sustainability benefits in GWP, which suggests them to be potential substitutions for OPC. However, the industrial waste treatment (i.e., preparation of fly ash) will deplete water bodies, and the sodium silicate induces significant environmental burdens during its manufacture, becoming the key factor to enhance the geopolymer’s sustainability.

Keywords: sustainable construction materials; alkali-activated geopolymers; ordinary Portland cement (OPC); mechanical properties; LCA analysis; cradle-to-grave approach; endpoint/midpoint assessment; industrial waste; environmental performance; SimaPro software (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11167/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11167/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11167-:d:652915

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().