Nature Is for Trees, Culture Is for Humans: A Critical Reading of the IPCC Report

Claudia Matus, Pascale Bussenius, Pablo Herraz, Valentina Riberi and Manuel Prieto
Additional contact information
Claudia Matus: College of Education, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile
Pascale Bussenius: Center for Educational Justice, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile
Pablo Herraz: Centro de Estudios Interculturales e Indígenas (CIIR), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile
Valentina Riberi: Center for Educational Justice, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile
Manuel Prieto: Departamento de Ciencias Históricas y Geográficas, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica 1010069, Chile

Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, issue 21, 1-9

Abstract: In this article, we problematize conventional views regarding culture presented in the assessment report entitled Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. This report is a contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report produced by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). We posit that when culture is seen as a stable category and imagined as a space composed of humans—and, more precisely, only certain humans—an epistemological, ontological, and ethical order is reproduced in which (a) nature is framed as a passive and apolitical “out there”, (b) knowledge based on this division is misleading and partial (e.g., social scientists study culture and natural scientists study nature), and (c) dominant humanist assumptions become common-sense explanations for inequalities. We conduct a critical discourse analysis of the IPCC report to better understand which assumptions produce the conceptualization of culture as a stable category. In our conclusion, we offer an example of a semiotic-meaning intervention of a section of the report to demonstrate the vitality of the concepts presented in this document. Subsequently, we discuss the consequences of omitting the vital traffic between the biological, social, and cultural realms from discussions on climate change to reexamine the production and reproduction of inequalities.

Keywords: IPCC; critical discourse analysis; normative ideas of culture; separation; inequalities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11903/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11903/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11903-:d:666513

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().